
Turning Hiring Chaos to Clarity
- Client
- Gentis Recruitment
- Date
- April 2020
- Role
- Product designer
- Website
- www.gentis.com
The Break point
“Why pay for multiple tools when we still rely on Excel as our ‘source of truth’?” This frustration from Stephanie, our main user, as seasoned HR expert, sparked the project. Our team used 6+ tools daily (including Wiggli, spreadsheets, and paid CRMs), wasting hours on manual updates and more than $15,5k/year on redundant software. Ironically, our own existing platform was part of the problem.
The Goal
Improve Wiggli by building an integrated Applicant Tracking System (ATS) to unify our workflow.
The Team
CEO, CFO, COO (All HR veterans), Backend/Frontend Leads, and myself as a UX/UI Designer.
1. Research: Learning from our own struggle
User Interviews
Deep-dived with CEO/CFO (who *were* the primary users) to map their daily frustrations.
Competitor Analysis
Studied tools like Greenhouse to identify gaps.
Persona
"Stephanie," the hiring manager (based on our Founders’ experiences), became our compass.
Why am I paying for three platforms if I still use Excel as a ‘source of truth’? I need to see all job postings, and candidates in one place, but I’m stuck switching between tools. Stephanie
Key Insight
The problem wasn’t missing features—it was “disconnected data” forcing constant app-switching.
2. Designing the Solution: Simplicity Over Complexity
Wireframes
Focused on a “single dashboard” showing all candidates (Kanban view).
Prototyping & Testing
Early version added “job publishing feature” (publishing the
job/vacancy on external channels directly from dashboard).
Interviews and calendar management to help user propose an interview
to a candidate and keep track of it.
Simplified the pipeline to “6 fixed stages” (mirroring actual
workflow, despite requests for customization).
Compromise
Backend concerns about new "skills tags" led to a “phased rollout” (tags first, AI matching later).
3. Navigating Challenges: Aligning Perspectives
CEO Pushback: Worried simplified features wouldn’t appeal to enterprise
clients.
CFO Intervention (as user and “stakeholder”): “Custom features cost us
$300/week in admin fixes. “It’s an MVP, let's save time first”.”
Outcome: We removed custom elements, and kept main features to preserve
clarity.
4. Results: One Platform to Rule Them All
Launched on Wiggli’s existing infrastructure, the ATS:
✅ Cut time reviewing candidates by 40% (no more cross-tool
checks).
✅ Saved more than $10.5k/year by replacing 4 paid tools.
✅ Reduced errors with a single, reliable data source.
“Finally, we're starting to have a tool that works the way we actually hire.”The CEO’s feedback post-launch
Why It Worked
User-Driven: We solved our "own" problem, ensuring deep
empathy.
Iterative Approach: Built on Wiggli’s foundation while adding critical
ATS functionality.
Team Alignment: Bridged design, engineering, and business needs
through constant collaboration.
Potential growth
AI Qualification: Let hiring managers automatically match and qualify candidates from the talent pool with posted jobs.
Key takeaways
1. Research as Validation: Even stakeholders need
interviewing.
2. Phased Rollouts: Manage technical risk while delivering
value.
3. Simplicity > Flexibility: When users are drowning, throw a life
raft—not a toolkit.